Generating and Generalizing Knowledge About Psychotherapy From Pragmatic Case Studies
نویسندگان
چکیده
An epistemological case is made for how single subject psychotherapy research provides unique and untapped opportunities for generating and generalizing scientific knowledge about psychotherapy. The epistemological claim asserts that it is essential that problem and method be aligned in psychotherapy research. Examples of misalignment in experimental and correlational contexts are given and their consequences discussed. Both Molenaar and Valsiner’s (2005) genetic metaphor of phenotypes and genotypes and Lewin’s (1931) concept of Aristotelian and Galileian thinking provides further epistemological grounds for the value of single subject research. Several suggestions are made for how to reconcile the epistemological problems discussed. Finally, examples are given of how a database generated by the PCSP journal process might serve as a tool to generate and generalize psychotherapy knowledge.
منابع مشابه
The Unfolding Case Formulation: The Interplay of Description and Inference
Single subject research (SSR) can complement findings from aggregated group data and contribute uniquely toward the goal of generating and generalizing scientific knowledge in psychology. The present study illustrates these assertions with psychotherapy case formulation research. In earlier work my team and I identified and operationalized multiple dimensions of quality in case formulations. Th...
متن کاملRound 2A: Finding Objectivity and Causality in Pragmatism – A Response to Held
In previous writings, I have set forth a rationale for the foundational knowledge value in psychology and psychotherapy of (a) the individual, systematic case study, and (b) inductive generalizations derived from databases of large numbers of such case studies. This rationale is build upon the epistemology and ontology of contemporary philosophical pragmatism and social constructionism as appli...
متن کاملBackward Pragmatic Transfer: The Case of Refusals in Persian
The purpose of this study was to examine Cook’s (2003) ‘multiple competence’ by investigating backward pragmatic transfer (from L2 [English] to L1 [Persian]) in refusals to invitations. It explored participants’ frequency and content of refusal strategies in L1 regarding the status (i.e., power and distance) of interlocutors and the proficiency level of EFL learners. The participants were Persi...
متن کاملCase-based Studies as a Source of Unity in Applied Psychology
To unify or not to unify applied psychology: That is the question. In this chapter we review pendulum swings in the historical efforts to answer this question, from a comprehensive, positivist, "top-down," deductive yes between the 1930s and the early 1960s to a postmodern no since then and until recently. We then present a rationale and proposal for a limited, "bottom-up," inductive yes, using...
متن کاملSeeking an Equal Place at the Therapy Research Table: An Introduction to a Series on the Pragmatic Case Study Method
This is an introduction to a series of three articles that address the potentials and challenges of a systematic and naturalistic approach to the case study method as embodied in the design of this PCSP journal, a model that the late Kenneth Howard called “patient-focused research.” These articles help to advance this model by addressing continuing barriers to case studies achieving an equal pl...
متن کامل